Posted in Professional learning, random ramblings

Ponderings from #energiseNZ2017

In the holidays, I went to the ENERGISE conference (A while back, Arnika Macphail asked me if I’d be keen to present at Energise, and I was like ‘hell yeah’. Then she asked if I’d like to co-present with Steve Mouldey, who I had never yet meet in the flesh and I was like ‘HELL YEAH’). Energise had a Educamp feel, so while the presenters were set, it was not about the ‘big names’ and more about the connections, ideas and challenges. While it was acknowledged that Cyclone was behind the conference, the team did a great job of not making it about things to ‘buy’. It was being hosted at Shotover Primary, so it was a good chance to visit a ‘new’ school and gain some insight into how it works. I had an amazing time, caught up with people, meet some new people, learned some new things, got challenged to ensure I was not just using ‘e-learning’ to engage student but to enhance their learning and was challenged around am I doing enough for my students.

Another interesting moment for me was during the ‘drum’ session. We had a really fun and amazing drum session on the second morning of the conference. I was sitting with 4 of my favourite educator peeps and laughed so hard. But it reinforced a funny idea for me. Do we really all need to be in time? Do we really need to be conforming to the same beat? I’ve been told I am reading to much into this type of activity… but I just wonder. So then of course it turned into us being ‘naughty’ and whacking the drum next to us out of time….. do we sometimes need to break those ‘rules’ to start something new?

BUT mostly energise got me thinking we really do need to change how we approach professional learning/development for teachers.

The pondering around changing PD has really stemmed from about 4 sources that were building before the conference, but these really bought it to my attention.

  1. Presenting with some-one you have never meet

I meet Steve for the first time the night before – drinking warm Sake in a (very nice) Japanese restaurant watching ‘magic’ tricks.

Screen Shot 2017-05-08 at 9.04.22 PM.png

That said, I have ‘talked’ with Steve loads online (As it turned out, this was a great way to introduce our session – a genuine we meet online gag 🙂 )We were given the brief ‘ Creating a STEAMULATING environment’ and were then basically left to our own devices on what to present.

We set up some collaborative docs (funnily enough a MICROSOFT OneNote and the GOOGLE slides…), had a skype and some twitter chats, and it just came together. I think (hope) because we were both open minded, coming from slightly different places and experiences, but willing to let these ideas be shared and compliment each other, rather than drowning each other out.

And despite my nerves, the presentation went pretty well I think. I’m not confident we ‘nailed’ it, but we definitely got some good discussion going, engaged our group, warmed up as it went on, and tried to avoid ‘us telling, them listening. Although we did still fall into the trap of saying what we did…. instead of listening to all the voices

As always with presenting, I benefit enormously by trying to explicitly describe what I am trying to achieve for my learners and myself – it is hard to put into words some times. And having another person to bounce idea off, especially from another school and ‘a different silo’ was especially helpful. So presenting with some-one I had never meet was a completely new experience for me, and I feel I learned loads. Which makes me think about ‘groups’ of teachers going to PLD – do we really get the same benefit if we only really talk to people from our schools rather than pushing ourselves to incorporate different points of views.

The reason I don’t feel I/we nailed it is because I wasn’t sure/confident we meet our learners expectations. Some people seemed to enjoy the discussion, while others seemed to want more from us – I don’t like the term spoon feeding but I do think some teachers expect this at PLD. Which leads into point number

2. What do teachers expect from PD?

The second day of the conference I went to a session that Steve ran on bringing empathy into learning conversations. He talked about how teachers see PLD, and loosely categorised teachers into some PLD stereotypes. As part of this, we were sent to ‘spy on/observe’ other sessions and see what we could see. And the stereotypes were there – Steve had outlined in his talk some in his talk, and I’ve added a couple

the teacher who wants something they can use in their class on monday

the teacher who came for morning tea

the teacher who came to meet and talk to people and build connections but is not really into the sessions

the teacher having an AHA moment

the teacher who obviously doesn’t want to be there

the teacher who is taking so many notes they couldn’t possibly be processing them, it is just verbatim. Will they ever look at those notes again

the teachers tweeting (usually me….)

the teacher catching up on emails.

the teacher obviously in presenter rapture and having a professional crush moment

 

All of which reinforced times when I have been in PD (honestly, I have been all the teachers above and more) and when I have delivered PD. The stand up the front and talk at people model doesn’t really work. And yet, we are still doing it. Which leads to point 3….

3. Why, oh why, do presenters still sit behind a laptop, sitting at a desk, talking their way through their slides..????

I went to a session like this, and could not cope. The person presenting obviously knew there stuff, and I had a great discussion with them afterwards that almost made up for the presentation. But it was so so so so so hard to sit through that 2 hours of slog. It felt like a slog. Even though I was learning new things, and interested at some points, the rest of the time I switched off.

We have learned that this is not working in our classrooms. Surely we should have learned that it doesn’t work for PLD.

And surely we as teacher should expect and demand more. Which leads me to point 4..

4. Why do ‘some’ teachers still expect PLD on a plate?

This constantly annoys me. I always try and make the most out of any opportunities that are provided to me. So I pay for my own PLD sometimes. I buy books and read them. I read blogs and talk to people. I also apply to different places for funding, and really make an effort to get to free stuff (I will drive to Christchurch for the educamp in Term 3 for example.) I also make use of free PLD on line – there are loads of MOOCs, courses, youtube videos, and of course the microsoft educator community (and the google one).

So I do get a bit pissy when people say to me, oh, you were at another conference. I go to them because I choose to, I often self fund, and I value them. Probably because of this, I have had several awesome opportunities to attend conferences paid for by other people. And if I got to those, I make sure I work every damn minute to get the most out of it for me and for the people attending. It is also why I started scichatNZ (along with Matt and the team) because I was frustrated at the lack of support for Science teachers wanting to break the mould….. and almost talked myself out of a ‘job’ when I’ve come to the conclusion that I really don’t want there to be subject silo’s….. sigh

So I do get hot and bothered when people attend PLD paid for out of precious school budgets and either 1) don’t get quality or 2) don’t put an effort in. 2 very different problems, but with a similar outcome – professional learning goes on the back burner as too hard, too much time, too expensive for what you get……

Changing the culture around staff professional learning in many schools is a challenge I don’t see going away any time soon, despite the efforts of many outstanding educators out there to change that mould.

So all in all I had an amazing time at Energise, and am really thankful for the opportunity to attend and share. It was definitely a ‘different’ type of teacher conference and I hope we see more of them in the future – I’m already looking forward to energise 2018.

Screen Shot 2017-05-10 at 9.59.07 AM.png
Thanks heaps to the team at Shotover for sharing you school, and the team at Cyclone for hosting us 🙂

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements
Posted in Teaching and Learning, Techie stuff

Saving time with collaborative planning on Sharepoint and Onenote

(I need to acknowledge the significant amounts of work done by the Science department of my school in getting this set up, especially Kevin for his work on Sharepoint and Ryan for his work with OneNote and the unit plans, and EVERYONE for being willing to go along with this and make it AWESOME)

At the end of last year, our department made a considerable push to update our unit plans and rejig our junior science programs. A big part of this was planning for the use of Microsoft Classroom in our school, and taking advantage of all of the features of the classbook that came automatically with each classroom. To this end, we have a staff portal on sharepoint with a ‘master’ Onenote that staff can take content from and easily add to their individual class note books, while still having access to shared resources to personalise as required for students particular levels or interests. It also allows for new or different resources and ideas to be added. It has saved an AMAZING amount of time having this back of resources all set up before we even started for the year.

The Teacher ‘Hub’

We have a pretty amazing Science set up on Sharepoint – we can book equipment, find our SMUS (safe method of use sheets), find curriculum reports etc… as well as a bank of resources for our classes.

scih.png
The Coffee cup takes you to the booking site for our amazing tech 🙂
sic1.png
Our junior sci home page – almost everything you need for any of these classes

We updated our unit plans to include live links to any documents, videos or animations you might use with your classes.

sci6

And have set up a conbines OneNote stored on the site that has a bank of resources also – which means you can copy the page into your classbook content library, and then students will have their own copy almost instantly after you have clicked the button.

sci3
Need the admin stuff – it is all right there….
sc4
Want the kids to do an interactive – a few clicks and they can have their own copy!!

So it doesn’t matter if it is an admin page (Like a year plan…) or sharing an interactive activity, it is all there and with maybe 4 mouse clicks, your students all have their own copies.

This has made the start of the year so easy. These digital portfolios were made in minutes for whole classes of students. Because the students had been entered into Microsoft classroom, teachers didn’t even have to manually enter students into the class notebooks. For the staff new to our department there was a ready made first few lessons for them while they came to grips with everything else. For our non-specialist science teachers, there was a range of resources they could just grab, whih gives them more time to explore any more indepth questions the class has.

For me, it has meant I already have a baseline. So I was able to spend more time getting to know my students, establish those relationship and find resources or learning activites specific to them. I am hoping that by the end of the first term, I won’t need to be finding the resources at all, the students will be able to find them or make their own. Which can then be shared in the collaboration space as meaningful activities to them.

Bring it!!

Posted in random ramblings, Teaching and Learning

Taking a risk with a mixed level class

Last year when subject choices were being made, I crossed a wee professional line. A complete blunder had been made (IMO). L3 PE had been put in the same line as L3 Chemistry. About 7 really good kids wanted to do to both. I told them (much to the displeasure of some… I got a wee telling off) to stick at it and put down both. I was sure that if enough kids wanted to do it, the option lines would have to change. But the timetable wasn’t to be shifted. So one enterprising young lass said something along the lines of ‘can’t I just sit in the back of Chizz’s class and learn Chem from there’? I marched to the powers that be and said that isn’t a problem. Being perfectly honest, I just didn’t see it being a problem. It’d be sweet I thought. A chance to do something pretty awesome even. Hell, I could even rock it!!

My HoD and TiC weren’t so convinced. Both for the students success and (kindly really…) for my workload. Letters got sent home to all students warning of the risks of a mixed class and how students needed to be aware that I was there for the L2 students, not for the L3’s. A concerned parent came in for a meeting that I was then not invited too (I cracked another professional strop at that point, as I hadn’t been consulted over the letter sent). Concerns were raised that the L2 students would not be getting a fair deal. I asked on the Chem teachers facebook page and other forums about peoples experiences teaching mixed classes. While some were positive, helpful and supportive, many were like ARGHHH, it is awful!!!

So a term and a half in, I am pleased to report it is the

single best thing I have ever done so far in teaching. 

Without a doubt, hands down, it has been amazing.

There are several things I think that contribute to the awesomeness

  1. The kids in the class, especially the L3 students (it got whittled down to 4 in the end), all want to be there. The L3 students are really thankful in their own wee teenage ways that I stretched some boundaries, went to bat for them and found a solution. The L2’s like having the feeling of being a bit more grown up, of seeing where the Chemistry goes, and I guess in general just getting to mix it up with the different kids. They are all willing to work hard, doing a little more independent work that they might have had to otherwise, and generally just get on with it. I think having the L3 students in the mix does help with the maturity of the class
  2. After their initial misgivings, my HoD and TiC came to the party and have been awesomely supportive by trusting me (and leaving me to it…) and supporting me as they can.
  3. The whole staff have been really awesome at letting me be flexible when I occasionally need the students out of different classes so it is easier for me to run assessments together. This has made the two internal assessments I’ve run way easier to manage in terms of practical gear and timings.
  4. Planning. Through a mixture of good luck and good planning, the timing are working really rather well. For example, the titration practical for L2 quant fell on the same day as tertiary day when all the L3 students where at the university open day. I have spent a lot of time thinking about how I can combines ideas and make the class about the Chemistry rather than about the standard. I still don’t have this perfect, but I’ve made some progress I think.

Which is where the awesomeness actually is. I’ve always talked and tried to teach the students rather than the Science, but my further removing myself from the standards, it has reached another Level of awesome

Here is an after fact summary of how the redox unit went. My actual plan was way messier…. but this is pretty much how it panned out. I tried to include a practical in each lesson and we spent lots of time reacting magnesium with lots of things 🙂 It took about 3-4 weeks worth of lessons over about 5 weeks of disruptions over the start of the year.

Screen Shot 2016-06-09 at 7.44.12 .png

Funny how you see the spelling mistakes after you take the screen shot

After redox, L2 started quant and L3 started organic. L3 was relatively self directed for the whole topic, a mixture of scipad work, office mix tutorials and practice exam questions. But there were times it came in handy. We used burning different alkanes, alkenes and alcohols as a context for yields. We reviewed the ideas of redox and also yields with the silver mirror text for aldehydes. Talking about properties of alcohols linked in well with intermolecular bonds and polarity of molecules. It lead into Hydrogen bonding for L3 so it will hopefully not be such a toughie when we come to it for AS&B. We all had fun making polymers and talking about different uses. When L2 were working on practice problems (which was sadly more often than I’d like…. something more to think about for next year) I had time to work with the L3’s. The L3’s results in the practice test weren’t great, but also it was a practice test and they just didn’t put the same effort into it as they did for the internals. Sigh

These two topics finished together and it was time to talk about bonds. Start of AS & B for L2, spec for L3. By talking about what bonds are it made me think more about the theory behind the spec assessment.  The L2’s got more of an understanding about why different types of intramolecular bonds are important. We talked about energy mostly. It was awesome.

Then while L3 worked away at spectra, L2 worked through shapes, bond angles and polarity. Which was a little bit linked into shielding for IR spectra. Mass spec tied in a little bit with calculating molecular masses. NMR not so much :). But we finished up the spec assessment just as L2 were moving into thermochem (this was more good timing, but I was hoping it would work out) so now we are going to talk about thermochem together as L3 start AS&B and L2 finish it off.

I survey the L2 students at the end of the 2 L2 internals.

It was mostly positive, with some good, practical suggestions around how they would like to spend more time. More notes from the board was still a strong feature of the feedback – so I have succumbed and done some more up the front teaching for properties of metals…

I love the comment that rounding is a dick – I think so too 🙂 But then that is an arguement for a while other blog post.

I also surveyed the whole class about how they thought things were going

So there is a progress report. I’m still having to go back to the standards and am still thinking about how I can lessen this. I’m trying to think of ways how I could prep students for success in exams without doing endless practice questions (any suggestions out there…..?????). But the students at both levels are (mostly) really enjoying the experience, there are 2 that are tolerating it that I am think about how I can support more, I am LOVING it, and the students results have been outstanding  in the internals (including one student who has done L2 and L3 together – he is going to skip the exam for Organic but pretty much do everything else). One L3 is going to give scholarship ago and so it is easy enough to funnel some extra readings on top of the independent work they are doing anyway and I’d like to think the recap of some L2 stuff will help.

Next steps are L2 will do organic while L3 do a little bit of 3.1 and periodic trends and intermolecular bonds for AS&B. Then both will start with chemical reactions – I think I’ll start with acids (Ka and Kb for L3), then rates for L2 while L3 take on buffers……, then equilibrium proper for L2. Then we are finishing with ID’ing ions for L2 which if I can time it right will be perfect for solubility in L3.

So I am really glad I stood up and said hell yeah, I’ll help you kids out. I’m really stoked I saw this as an opportunity rather than a burden. But most of all, I’m relieved that rather than a disaster, is is stretching me, growing me, challenging my and ‘feeding’ me. It has really kept me going this year. Reminded me of why I teach and let me move with more confidence away from just teaching standards and more into teaching the kids.

Posted in random ramblings, Teaching and Learning

Purposeful play

Lately I have been thinking about how to describe my ‘classroom practice’ that has a positive impact on my students – for an interview/article if you are interested in why I would think about such things so explicitly. It has also been appraisal docs time, and report writing time, and at the moment I just need to have some things clearly written down.

Which is a problem. For me anyway.

Take unit plans for example. We have some beautiful, reasonably useful lesson plans that I am working through and trying to embed various activities into – eg where it says use a kahoot quiz, have the link to the kahoot quiz embedded in. This is an effort to make the unit plans even more useful, so you don’t have to go back to the folder and find the document blah blah blah. Want the ‘powerpoint’ click and it takes you to it on the shared document library on sites. So the unit plan is hopefully going to become more of a one stop shop for resources – and people can be collaborative as we are all able to contribute different activities or resources by popping in a link to the activity

However, this isn’t how I see my unit plans. A ‘unit’ of work isn’t independent of other ‘unit’s of work. I’d really like to some-how see a yr 7-13 flow through of what we want our students to be able to do after that time doing Science (or after yr 10 when they can opt out of Science if they want to) (cue sobbing).

So I have been thinking about jargoning up how I really want to let my students play. In a purposeful way of course, but actually just explore ideas, work together on stuff they are interested in (or individually), learning so called ‘soft skills’ that are really important like time management and prioritising and using digital tech efficiently. How I want them to explore and make their own discoveries rather than listen to me drone on about the discoveries of others. How I want them to make connections between ideas, between observations, between contexts and subjects. Today I got onto the power of one because I was talking about diamonds being hard, so then diamond drills, then Peekay and Botha in the mines in power of one. Made perfect sense really.

And in thinking through this, it is interesting I got onto literature today, when I am struggling to find the words to express what I am wanting to achieve. I know what it feels like in my classroom – a purposeful hum of noise that ebbs and flows as discussions build up when there are questions or problems to be solved, a focused sort of energy, students critically questioning without fear of being wrong or mocked (gently mocked maybe….) and models being drawn or built or made, or practicals being designed rather than just carried out as per the instructions in the book.

And don’t get me wrong, I don’t always get there. Sometimes it turns into hell fire confusion with flaming curtains (literally with a particular yr 10 class one time) but when it works it is AWESOME. It is messy, hard to describe, loud and quiet, focused and random, and it is purposeful, meaningful learning.

I still don’t know how to put that into a unit plan.